Annuity and lump-sum decisions in defined benefit plans: the role of plan rules.

نویسنده

  • Sudipto Banerjee
چکیده

Amidst growing concerns about workers outliving their retirement savings, a key question-both as a matter of national retirement policy and understanding the potential role of plan design and education in influencing individual decision-making-is how many retiring workers actually choose to annuitize (to take a stream of lifetime income) vs. opting for a lump-sum payment. The key finding of this study is that differences in defined benefit (DB) plan rules or features result in very different annuitization rates in DB plans. In fact, the results show that the rate of annuitization varies directly with the degree to which plan rules restrict the ability to choose a partial or lump-sum distribution. This study shows that annuitization rates vary significantly across these different plan types, which makes any attempt to combine the annuitization rates across these different plan types uninformative. Combining all the plans across the years 2005-2010, workers who made their payout decision between ages 50 and 75 had a minimum job tenure of five years, a minimum account balance of $5,000, and had an annuitization rate of 65.8 percent. But within this group of workers, those who had no plan restrictions on a lump-sum distribution had an annuitization rate of only 27.3 percent. In all the years studied, plans with no lump-sum distribution (LSD) options have the highest annuitization rates, very close to 100 percent. Traditional defined benefit and cash balance plans with no restrictionson LSDs had the lowest annuitization rates. In 2010, the annuitization rate for all plans combined was 65.5 percent, while for plans with no LSD option it was 98.8 percent, but the annuitization rate for defined benefit plans with no restrictions on LSDs was 44.3 percent, while for cash balance plans with no restrictions on LSDs it was 22.3 percent. For older workers across most plan types, annuitization rates increase steadily with account balance, but this is not the case for younger workers. Annuitization rates also increase with tenure, but for younger workers (20-50) with low tenure (less than 10 years), annuitization rates are very low. For older workers (50-75), annuitization rates are higher even in cases of low tenure. Annuitization rates are very low for those below age 40, but from that point onwards, annuitization rates increase for all types of plans. Annuitization rates appear to peak between 65 and 69, but then fall sharply.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Defined benefit pension plan distribution decisions by public sector employees

a r t i c l e i n f o Studies examining pension distribution choices have found that the tendency of private-sector workers is to select lump sum distributions instead of life annuities resulting in leakage of retirement savings. In the public sector, defined benefit pensions usually offer lump sum distributions equal to employee contributions, not the present value of the annuity. Thus, for te...

متن کامل

How Will the Rise in 4 ( K ) Plans Affect Bequests ?

This brief explores how the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution pension plans might affect bequests and thereby consumption and saving. Bequests can occur under two different types of circumstances: (1) individuals plan to leave an inheritance for their heirs (an intended bequest); or (2) individuals have no specific inheritance plans, but die before consuming all of their assets...

متن کامل

Statement of Mark J. Warshawsky Director of Retirement Research Towers Watson for the Joint Hearing of the Departments of Treasury and Labor on Certain Issues Relating to Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans

As is well-documented, private sector employers have been moving away from traditional defined benefit pension plans for more than a decade. These plans generally pay benefits to a participant as a life annuity, thereby providing a fixed stream of lifetime income at retirement. Employers have moved toward defined contribution and hybrid plans, that is, individual account plans, which are almost...

متن کامل

Are Cognitive Constraints a Barrier to Annuitization?

With the shift from defined benefit pensions to 401(k) plans, individuals are increasingly responsible not only for saving for retirement but also for drawing down their assets in retirement. These drawdown decisions require substantial cognitive effort and are very difficult for the average person. Yet most models of asset decumulation ignore the possibility that individuals may differ in thei...

متن کامل

The changing face of private retirement plans.

A rapidly growing public policy concern facing the United States is whether future generations of retired Americans, particularly those in the "baby boom" generation, will have adequate retirement incomes. One reason is that Social Security's projected long-term financial shortfall could result in a reduction in the current-law benefit promises made to future generations of retirees. Another re...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • EBRI issue brief

دوره 381  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013